Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Incompleteness: whether something is incomplete can only be determined in relation to something that allows for a closer determination. For this purpose, e.g. a continuation rule, a type description, or a categorization must be specified. Objects, which are also parts of something, can then be fully described as an object if they do not need the context of which they are a part. See also indeterminacy, determination, context/context dependency, description, description levels, completeness._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
H. Wessel on Incompleteness - Dictionary of Arguments
I 200 syntactically incomplete: a sysstem that is syntactically incomplete is expandable without contradiction. In contrast: Maximum (e.g. a system can be maximum consistent). >Syntax, >Extension, >Completeness, >Systems, >Consistency, >Contradictions._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Wessel I H. Wessel Logik Berlin 1999 |
||
> Counter arguments against Wessel
> Counter arguments in relation to Incompleteness
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-28